{"id":1673,"date":"2014-07-31T01:47:51","date_gmt":"2014-07-31T05:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/heavytopspin.com\/?p=1673"},"modified":"2014-07-31T01:47:51","modified_gmt":"2014-07-31T05:47:51","slug":"serve-and-pray-the-quirks-of-isners-early-exit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2014\/07\/31\/serve-and-pray-the-quirks-of-isners-early-exit\/","title":{"rendered":"Serve-and-Pray: The Quirks of Isner&#8217;s Early Exit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The big story after\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/cgi-bin\/player.cgi?p=SteveJohnson\">Steve Johnson<\/a>&#8216;s upset of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/cgi-bin\/player.cgi?p=JohnIsner\">John Isner<\/a> today was Isner&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Sports\/wireStory\/nishikori-beats-querrey-sets-washington-24781695\">unhappiness with his court assignment<\/a>. Still, for those of us more interested in the game itself\u00a0than in post-match carping, Johnson&#8217;s surprise victory was plenty notable.<\/p>\n<p>Almost every Isner match is a serve-dominated, one-dimensional contest. This one was even more unidimensional than usual. Both players won 89% of first-serve points, a combined mark that stands as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/yearlies\/ATP_2014_leaders.html#firstwpm\">the most extreme of the season<\/a>. Two players haven&#8217;t combined to win more than\u00a089.2% of first serve points since Brisbane early\u00a0<em>last<\/em> season, when <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/cgi-bin\/player.cgi?p=GrigorDimitrov\">Grigor Dimitrov<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/cgi-bin\/player.cgi?p=MilosRaonic\">Milos Raonic<\/a> combined for an outrageous 94.0% of first-serve points won.<\/p>\n<p>The difference between Isner and Johnson&#8211;slim as it was&#8211;appears in their success rate on second-serve points. Johnson won an impressive 68% of second offerings, while Isner won only 43%. That typically doesn&#8217;t do the job&#8211;since 2010, Isner has won only <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/cgi-bin\/player.cgi?p=JohnIsner&amp;f=A2014qq,2013qq,2012qq,2011qq,2010qqTcx2nd_WPc-lt-45qqs140o1\">eight of 36 matches<\/a> when he wins fewer than 45% of second-serve points. Still, he managed to avoid clustering too many of those ineffective second serves, allowing Johnson only two break points.<\/p>\n<p>As bad as that second-serve winning percentage is, it would often by sufficient\u00a0when combined with that other-worldly win rate on first serves. Taken together, he won 73% of service points, which&#8211;barring particularly good or bad streaks&#8211;<a href=\"https:\/\/gist.github.com\/JeffSackmann\/768862\">translates<\/a> to a hold of serve in 93% of service games. That&#8217;s Isner&#8217;s hold rate for the season so far, and sure enough, it was his hold rate today, when he was broken only once in 16 tries.<\/p>\n<p>While Big John often seems unbreakable, he typically loses a service game or two in every match&#8211;even on the days he wins. He&#8217;s been broken exactly once in nine hard-court matches this year, and he&#8217;s won seven of those matches. \u00a0Since 2010, he&#8217;s won 45 of the 60 matches in which his opponent broke him exactly one time&#8211;many of them thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2013\/11\/29\/the-luck-of-the-tiebreak-2013-edition\/\">his excellent tiebreak record<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But today, his opponent really was unbreakable. Compared to Johnson&#8217;s service numbers, Isner&#8217;s look positively pedestrian. Steve won 80% of service points, which&#8211;again, barring too much streakiness&#8211;translates to\u00a0a hold of service in an incredible 97.8% of service games. Put another way, that&#8217;s one break of serve every eight sets or so. \u00a0(For reference, Isner&#8217;s 93% season-to-date average is best on tour, and no one topped 92% for the 2013 season.)<\/p>\n<p>Johnson&#8217;s not usually that good&#8211;Isner&#8217;s indifferent return game explains much of the magnitude of these numbers. Still, it&#8217;s an extremely bad return performance by any standard. It&#8217;s only the fifth time since 2010 that Isner has won so few return points in a match he completed, and it&#8217;s only the second time this year he has failed to earn a single break point. Remarkably, that last aspect of return futility isn&#8217;t always enough to keep him out of the win column: Three times, he has won a tour-level match without earning any break points.<\/p>\n<p>Today, despite the lack of break points, despite the dismal second-serve percentage, despite winning 12 fewer points than his opponent, he found himself in a third-set tiebreak, two points away from victory. Big John&#8217;s game isn&#8217;t much fun to watch&#8211;while this all transpired, I was across the grounds taking in a doubles match&#8211;but on paper, his results are endlessly fascinating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The big story after\u00a0Steve Johnson&#8216;s upset of John Isner today was Isner&#8217;s unhappiness with his court assignment. Still, for those of us more interested in the game itself\u00a0than in post-match carping, Johnson&#8217;s surprise victory was plenty notable. Almost every Isner match is a serve-dominated, one-dimensional contest. This one was even more unidimensional than usual. Both &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2014\/07\/31\/serve-and-pray-the-quirks-of-isners-early-exit\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Serve-and-Pray: The Quirks of Isner&#8217;s Early Exit<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-american-tennis"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}