{"id":3529,"date":"2019-04-29T14:45:45","date_gmt":"2019-04-29T14:45:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/?p=3529"},"modified":"2019-04-29T14:45:45","modified_gmt":"2019-04-29T14:45:45","slug":"podcast-episode-59-more-surprises-on-clay-and-laffaire-gimelstob","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2019\/04\/29\/podcast-episode-59-more-surprises-on-clay-and-laffaire-gimelstob\/","title":{"rendered":"Podcast Episode 59: More Surprises on Clay, and L&#8217;Affaire Gimelstob"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Episode 59 of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/06\/the-tennis-abstract-podcast\/\">Tennis Abstract Podcast<\/a>, with Carl Bialik of the <a href=\"https:\/\/thirtylove.libsyn.com\/\">Thirty Love podcast<\/a>, re-evaluates Rafael Nadal&#8217;s status as clay-court favorite after his semi-final loss to Dominic Thiem in Barcelona. We also consider what Daniil Medvedev is doing right, even if it didn&#8217;t work against Thiem. We compare Medvedev&#8217;s accomplishments to those of another Russian, Karen Khachanov, and consider which set of skills is likely to lead to a better career. The same type of comparison is worth making for Istanbul finalist Marketa Vondrousova, whose counterpunching style differs from many of her teenage peers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, we dive into the muck of Justin Gimelstob&#8217;s assault case and tennis&#8217;s typically incoherent response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thanks for listening!<\/p>\n\n\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3529-1\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/TennisAbstractPodcast-episode059.mp3?_=1\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/TennisAbstractPodcast-episode059.mp3\">http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/TennisAbstractPodcast-episode059.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>(Note: this week&#8217;s episode is about 72 minutes long; in some browsers the audio player may display a different length. Sorry about that!)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/TennisAbstractPodcast-episode059.mp3\">Click to listen<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/the-tennis-abstract-podcast\/id1223937610\">subscribe on iTunes<\/a>, or use <a href=\"http:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/feed.xml\">our feed<\/a> to get updates on your favorite podcast software.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Episode 59 of the Tennis Abstract Podcast, with Carl Bialik of the Thirty Love podcast, re-evaluates Rafael Nadal&#8217;s status as clay-court favorite after his semi-final loss to Dominic Thiem in Barcelona. We also consider what Daniil Medvedev is doing right, even if it didn&#8217;t work against Thiem. We compare Medvedev&#8217;s accomplishments to those of another &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2019\/04\/29\/podcast-episode-59-more-surprises-on-clay-and-laffaire-gimelstob\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Podcast Episode 59: More Surprises on Clay, and L&#8217;Affaire Gimelstob<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-podcast"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}