{"id":4408,"date":"2021-04-21T17:09:37","date_gmt":"2021-04-21T17:09:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/?p=4408"},"modified":"2021-04-21T17:09:37","modified_gmt":"2021-04-21T17:09:37","slug":"podcast-episode-106-monte-carlo-simulations-arent-as-good-as-the-real-thing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2021\/04\/21\/podcast-episode-106-monte-carlo-simulations-arent-as-good-as-the-real-thing\/","title":{"rendered":"Podcast Episode 106: Monte Carlo Simulations Aren’t As Good As the Real Thing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Episode 106 of the Tennis Abstract Podcast<\/a>, with Carl Bialik of the Thirty Love podcast<\/a>, is our recap of the Monte Carlo Masters, where Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal bowed out early, and Stefanos Tsitsipas showed us just how good a clay-courter he could be. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We have lots of questions, and offer at least a few potential answers. How much do we need to revise our assessments of Djokovic and Nadal after their early losses? Is Stefanos Tsitsipas now the biggest threat to Nadal at Roland Garros? Has Djokovic fallen back to the pack? Has Rafa lost a step? Is Dan Evans someone worth watching on clay now? Can a slice backhand ever be a weapon on a slow surface? What can flat hitters do to overcome their disadvantage on clay? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thanks for listening!<\/p>\n\n\nhttp:\/\/tennisabstract.com\/podcast\/TennisAbstractPodcast-episode106.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n\n\n\n

(Note: this week’s episode is about 61 minutes long; in some browsers the audio player may display a different length. Sorry about that!<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click to listen<\/a>, subscribe on iTunes<\/a>, or use our feed<\/a> to get updates on your favorite podcast software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Music: Everyone Has Gone Home<\/a> by texasradiofish (c) copyright 2020. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial (3.0) license. Ft: spinningmerkaba<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Podcast housekeeping:<\/p>\n\n\n\n