{"id":5129,"date":"2022-05-14T05:40:31","date_gmt":"2022-05-14T05:40:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/?p=5129"},"modified":"2022-05-14T05:40:31","modified_gmt":"2022-05-14T05:40:31","slug":"the-tennis-128-no-85-svetlana-kuznetsova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tennisabstract.com\/blog\/2022\/05\/14\/the-tennis-128-no-85-svetlana-kuznetsova\/","title":{"rendered":"The Tennis 128: No. 85, Svetlana Kuznetsova"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a>
Svetlana Kuznetsova at the 2009 US Open. Credit: Robbie Mendelson<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In 2022, I\u2019m counting down the 128 best players<\/a> of the last century. With luck, we\u2019ll get to #1 in December. Enjoy!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

* * *<\/p>\n\n\n\nSvetlana Kuznetsova [RUS]<\/b>\n
Born: 27 June 1985\n
Career: 2002-present\n
Plays: Right-handed (two-handed backhand)\n
Peak rank: 2 (2007)\n
Peak Elo rating: 2,192 (3rd place, 2007)\n
Major singles titles: 2\n
Total singles titles: 18\n
 \n\n\n\n

* * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two longest matches of the 2011 season lasted exactly four hours and 48 minutes each. At the Australian Open, David Nalbandian outlasted Lleyton Hewitt in the first round, 3-6, 6-4, 3-6, 7-6(1), 9-7. At the US Open, Juan Carlos Ferrero beat Ga\u00ebl Monfils, 7-6(5), 5-7, 6-7(5), 6-4, 6-4. There were 17 five-setters that reached the four-hour mark that year, including the US Open final between Novak Djokovi\u0107 and Rafael Nadal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third longest match of 2011 wasn’t one of those five-setters. No, it was a fourth-round women’s<\/em> match at the Australian Open. Svetlana Kuznetsova and Francesca Schiavone battled for four hours and 44 minutes before Schiavone came out on top, 6-4, 1-6, 16-14. It was the second-longest WTA match in history, behind only the wacky 1984 contest<\/a> with the 643-shot rally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Melbourne marathon had everything. 80 deuces, 50 break points, and 17 breaks of serve–over 1,800 shots by the time it was done. Both women even serve-and-volleyed–Schiavone led that category by doing it twice. To say it was topsy-turvy would be a bit like calling Isner-Mahut “long.” The contributor who logged the match (all 358 points of it!) for the Match Charting Project noted at the 4:25 mark, “Both players starting to look a bit tired.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Kuznetsova-Schiavone head-to-head is one of the wilder subplots of 21st century women’s tennis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
TennisAbstract.com attempts to summarize the impossible.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Kuznetsova won 10 of the 16 meetings, but Schiavone snuck off with half of the six three-setters. Sveta won the first of their epic clashes in the 2007 Fed Cup final. Four years after their meeting at the 2011 Australian Open, they did it again, going to 10-8 in the third in Paris. That match didn’t quite clear the four-hour mark, but like the gutbuster in Melbourne, it had just about everything else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kuznetsova’s history against her Italian rival represents her career in miniature. She has enjoyed the occasional triumph in between struggles with inconsistency. She has fought out one slugfest after another, losing many of them by the smallest of margins. Most of all, she has played lots and lots of tennis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

* * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, both of Kuznetsova’s victories in major finals were rather tidy affairs. At the US Open in 2004, she outplayed Elena Dementieva<\/a>, 6-3, 7-5, and at the French in 2009, she defeated Dinara Safina, 6-4, 6-2. Both opponents had their own internal demons to grapple with, and Sveta took advantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was rarely that simple. The Spring after her US Open victory, she suffered a sequence of near-misses that would’ve sent lesser competitors into early retirement. At Indian Wells, she lost to Dementieva, 7-5 in the third. In Miami, she fell to Ana Ivanovi\u0107, 7-5 in the third. A month later in Warsaw, she beat Kim Clijsters but lost in the final to Justine Henin–you guessed it–7-5 in the third. Another month down the road at Roland Garros, she lost another three-hour heart-breaker to Henin. You don’t need me to tell you what happened from 5-all in the third set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Kuznetsova in 2010. Credit: Steve Collis<\/a> <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

She bounced back to reach the Wimbledon quarter-finals, but when it came time to defend her US Open title, her nerves could no longer keep up. In Flushing, she lost to 97th-ranked Ekaterina Bychkova in straight sets, making her the first female US Open champion to lose the following year in the first round. Her ranking, which had reached a career-best number four in August, careened back out of the top ten.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Her defense of the 2009 French Open title was nearly as punchless. Her entire 2010 clay court campaign lasted seven matches, including first round exits in Rome and Madrid to Maria Kirilenko and Shahar Peer, respectively. (Both were in three sets, but the Peer match ended 6-0.) At Roland Garros, she reached the third round only to lose once more–in three sets, of course–to Kirilenko. Her ranking had climbed back to number three after winning the 2009 Beijing title, but with the French Open points gone, she fell out of the top ten again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kuznetsova’s peak came in between the two slam titles, when she reached number two on the WTA computer (and 3rd on the Elo list) in late 2007. She won the US Open warmup in New Haven in the strangest way possible: a three-setter over Agnieszka Radwa\u0144ska and then three victories by retirement. In the season as a whole, she won 17 of her 24 deciding sets. Unfortunately, two of the seven losses came at the year-end WTA Tour Championships in Madrid. She failed to win a match against the elite field, falling to Ana Ivanovi\u0107 by a score of (what was that again?) 7-5 in the third.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

* * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I trust that you’ve noticed a pattern. In 2009, Pete Bodo called Sveta “a complicated young lady who never met a match she couldn’t choke away.” That isn’t quite right, even if it has sometimes felt that way. She is plenty complicated, to be sure, and she has a knack for making any match she played as complicated as she is–often emerging through the muddle as an exhausted winner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here are the active leaders in three-set matches played:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Player                    Deciders  Wins  Losses  \nSvetlana Kuznetsova            355   215     140  \nVenus Williams                 306   187     119  \nAngelique Kerber               271   152     119  \nAlize Cornet                   261   140     121  \nPetra Kvitova                  254   149     105  \nSara Errani                    251   125     126  \nAnastasia Pavlyuchenkova       246   133     113  \nSerena Williams                236   170      66  \nVera Zvonareva                 234   137      97  \nKarolina Pliskova              208   131      77<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
These numbers might be off by a couple of matches here and there–they may include the occasional ITF or a misclassified retirement or two. If you look up the results using Tennis Abstract’s filters, you’ll get slightly different records. But the margins here are so big that the details don’t matter. Kuznetsova has played way<\/em> more three-setters than any other active player. She tops the list in both wins and losses as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It’s a bit surprising, given all of the Russian’s memorable defeats, that her winning percentage is so high, at 61%. She’s just a tick behind Venus Williams (also 61%), and the only other women on this list who win their three-setters at a higher rate are Serena Williams (72%) and Karol\u00edna Pl\u00ed\u0161kov\u00e1 (63%). Jelena Jankovi\u0107, who had a great deal in common with Kuznetsova, also played more than 300 three-setters in her career but lost more often than she won.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Sveta in the 2018 Washington final (yes, it was a three-setter). <\/em>
Credit: Keith Allison<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Kuznetsova also stands out when we limit our view to the tightest three-set contests. Here are the active leaders in matches that reach 5-all in the decider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Player               3rd 5-alls  Wins  Losses  \nSvetlana Kuznetsova          80    46      34  \nVenus Williams               75    41      34  \nSerena Williams              56    32      24  \nAngelique Kerber             54    31      23  \nKarolina Pliskova            53    31      22  \nCaroline Garcia              49    33      16  \nPetra Kvitova                49    27      22  \nAndrea Petkovic              47    22      25  \nVarvara Lepchenko            47    20      27  \nKristina Mladenovic          45    20      25<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
In this category as well, Sveta has played more matches than any other active player. She has won more of them, and she’s tied with Venus for the most losses. Again, for all the painful 7-5 defeats, her win rate is respectable. Jankovi\u0107 played 78 of these, and she lost more often than she won. Another contemporary with a reputation for circuitous routes from coin toss to handshake, Sam Stosur, won just 24 of 67 matches when they were so close.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
* * *<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It’s a clich\u00e9 that tennis players struggle when they think too much. In Kuznetsova’s case, it might be true. She certainly has more going on upstairs than the direction of her next serve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Journalist Matt Cronin described Sveta as more introspective than the other Russian stars of her generation. He interviewed her in early 2013, when she returned to the tour after a six-month hiatus. Her excitement to come back wasn’t quite wholehearted:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When you play over and over every year the same tournament, the same players, it’s quite difficult. I never feel sick of the game because I love tennis a lot. I have been sick from travel and sick from staying away from home, from my family, from my friends. But I never hated tennis. I love tennis and I enjoy tennis.\u2026 But I’ve been watching matches, and I didn’t really feel like I wanted to be out there.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
She may have had reservations, but she picked up where she left off. For three years, she played a full schedule, coming through qualifying when necessary and reaching the occasional final. It wasn’t until 2016, after her 30th birthday and more than a decade past her first major title, that she returned to the ranks of the elite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She started the 2016 season ranked 25th, and quickly made a statement, knocking top seed Simona Halep<\/a> out of Sydney in three sets. If fans needed any more proof that Sveta was back in all her glory, she turned in another performance for the history books in Fed Cup the next month. She and Rich\u00e8l Hogenkamp went at it for four hours, the longest match in the competition’s history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Kuznetsova in 2014. Credit: NAPARAZZI<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
She lost the Hogenkamp match, 10-8 in the third, but she won a whopping 22 three-setters that year. That’s not quite a record–Petra Kvitov\u00e1<\/a> won 25 in 2013–but it was by far the most of Kuznetsova’s third-set packed career. One of the third sets got her past world number one Serena Williams in Miami; another put her in the second week at Wimbledon when she beat Sloane Stephens, 6-7(1), 6-2, 8-6. In October, she needed to win the title in Moscow to qualify for the elite year-end championships, and with three-set wins in the quarter-finals and semi-finals, she did just that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Less than 48 hours after securing the Moscow trophy, she was 5,000 miles away in Singapore, taking on Agnieszka Radwa\u0144ska in her first round-robin match. She had climbed back into the top ten after more than six years, so she must have felt that she could handle anything–even some unwanted hair in her face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n