1973 Redux Archives - Page 12 of 13

April 27, 1973: Battle of the Undergrads

*A 1973 college match at the Nicollet Tennis Center in Minneapolis*

By the time she was 19, Molly Hannas had been playing against boys and men for years. It wasn’t until she was 1973 that her story caromed off the zeitgeist.

Hannas started her career playing high school tennis in Kansas City–on the boys’ team. She headed next to Purdue, competing against women and finishing runner-up in the Big Ten conference tournament. After a year, she transferred to Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota. There was a women’s team there, but like at most institutions in 1973, it was nothing more than a club sport–an opportunity to get some practice with a part-time coach and play a few matches against local opponents.

Molly quickly got the lay of the land at Macalester and realized she could compete with anybody there, regardless of gender. The men’s coach, Jack Bachman, didn’t have any problem with her trying out for his team. She not only made the cut, she won the ladder competition and began the 1973 season as the squad’s number one player. Hannas’s first victim smashed his racket in frustration. Bachman kept the damaged stick as a souvenir.

In her own telling, Hannas wasn’t fighting any larger battle: She just wanted to play tennis. She assumed the same of the college boys across the net, and few of them treated her badly. Still, her success marked another tiny step on the road to gender equality in college sports. Title IX, the U.S. law that forbade sex-based discrimination at schools receiving federal funding, had passed in 1972. But no one had yet applied the law to athletics. Progress remained in the hands of one-off lawsuits and small-scale trailblazers like Molly.

The reputation of Macalester’s new star spread quickly. Bachman’s tally of broken rackets remained at one–it’s harder to get angry when you expect to lose. Hannas’s teammates were supportive–her doubles partner, John Molder, was especially complimentary–and competitors around the conference* learned that they needed to ignore her gender. “I thought I’d be embarrassed if I got beat,” said a vanquished rival from Bemidji State. “But I don’t. She’s just a real good player.”

* The best team in the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference belonged to Gustavus Adolphus College, where the squad included a strong doubles player named Tim Butorac. Tim’s son Eric would star with the Gusties 30 years later, then go on to reach the Australian Open doubles final in 2014.

On April 27, Macalester’s season was winding down when the Associated Press sent Molly’s story out over the wire. She made the paper back at home in Kansas City. She even got a squib in the “People in Sports” column of the New York Times. The Times didn’t make an explicit connection to the upcoming Bobby Riggs–Margaret Court match, barely two weeks away, but no reader would’ve missed the link. It had been the biggest story in tennis for a month.

Hannas stayed focused on her local battles. “I like to think I play in Billie Jean King’s style,” she said. “But I’d never be able to match her.”

* * *

This post is part of my series about the 1973 season, Battles, Boycotts, and Breakouts. Keep up with the project by checking the TennisAbstract.com front page, which shows an up-to-date Table of Contents after I post each installment.

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 22, 1973: How Good Is Chrissie?

*Chris Evert and Evonne Goolagong play for a packed house*

The USLTA circuit in the beginning of 1973 was sometimes referred to as the “Chrissie and Evonne show.” Most of the leading lights of women’s tennis were signed up to Gladys Heldman’s rival Virginia Slims tour. Chris Evert and Evonne Goolagong had the talent and star power to draw crowds, but the rest of the field at the USLTA events was an often motley mix of juniors, journeywomen, and Eastern Europeans.

In fact, it was generous to include Evonne’s name at all. She was Chrissie’s equal in name recognition only. Evert entered the St. Petersburg final on April 22nd on a 21-match win streak. She had won five of six events, losing only a single match to Virginia Wade, a 9-7, third-set nailbiter in Dallas. She had dropped only two other sets in that time. Goolagong had won the first encounter between the two ladies, in the previous year’s Wimbledon semi-final. But since then, Chrissie had won four in a row.

The St. Pete event, held at Bartlett Park, had good memories for Evert. She had picked up her first adult title there two years earlier, when she was just 16. Steady as a backboard, she overcame an injured Billie Jean King in the semis, then allowed just three games to Julie Heldman in the final. She was soon popular enough to draw crowds anywhere, but her star was at its brightest in her native Florida. Fans in St. Petersburg “did everything but tear down the fence” to watch the final.

The championship match didn’t disappoint. Chrissie played her typical relentless game, forcing errors to take the first set. In the second, Goolagong evened the score with élan. Recovering the effortless brilliance that had won her the French and Wimbledon titles in 1971, she took the set, 6-0.

“It’s been a long time since I’ve lost a love set,” Evert said. “It was kind of frightening the way she did it.”

Chrissie could only be shaken so far. Goolagong’s streaks were famous for vanishing as quickly as they arose, and today was no different. The Australian won the first game of the final set, then Evert took five in a row. Goolagong fought back to 4-5 before the Floridian’s two-handed backhand finished the job.

Evert finished the eight-tournament USLTA circuit with six singles titles and total prize money of $41,350. She was, by far, the best player on the tour.

* * *

But how did she stack up against the Slims group? The division in women’s tennis left that question to be answered in Europe, where the field would finally come together in May.

The same day that Evert beat Goolagong in St. Petersburg, Margaret Court outlasted Rosie Casals across the state in Jacksonville. It marked Casals’s 23rd straight loss to the imperious Court, this time by a score of 5-7, 6-3, 6-1. Rosie had taken the first set on several other occasions, but she could only warn her colleagues on tour: “If you don’t beat Margaret in straight sets, you’re in trouble.”

Casals would have said the same thing to Chrissie. She was well aware of the young talent, having lost to Evert twice in 1972. But the Australian was still the woman to beat. “Without question,” Casals said after the final, “Margaret Court is the greatest in the world and will continue to be as long as she continues to play.”

* * *

Elsewhere this week:

Ken Rosewall won his third title in as many weeks with a final-round victory in Charlotte over Arthur Ashe. He had struggled throughout the week, needing three sets against each of Ismail El Shafei, Tom Gorman, and Roscoe Tanner. But when the second set of the championship match went to a tiebreak, he took no chances, reeling off six points in a row to secure the decision.
16-year-old Björn Borg reached his first final as an adult, progressing through the all-European field in Monte Carlo before losing a straight-set final to Ilie Năstase.
In other men’s events, young Americans made a mark. With the top players gone in Johannesburg, 21-year-old Brian Gottfried took the title on a walkover from Chile’s Jaime Fillol. Back at home, in Columbus, Georgia, Eddie Dibbs knocked out Jimmy Connors while 18-year-old Vitas Gerulaitis upset both Richard González and Clark Graebner. Dibbs won the final.
As if that wasn’t enough teenage success stories for one week: The sibling duo of Buster (17) and Linda Mottram (15) won both singles events at the Cumberland Hard Courts tournament in Hampstead, England. Linda’s breakthrough was particularly impressive, as she overcame both Virginia Wade and former Wimbledon finalist Christine (Truman) Janes. The prize money was a pittance compared to other events around the world, but Buster and Linda didn’t even get the £60 and £45 promised to the winners. The International Lawn Tennis Federation didn’t allow any prize money at all for players under the age of 18. Tony Mottram, father of Buster and Linda, could sympathize: When he won the event in 1949 and 1951, there wasn’t prize money for anybody.
16-year-old Nick Saviano triumphed at the prestigious Easter Bowl junior tournament in Manhattan. Taking the 14-and-under title was a promising lefty from Queens named John McEnroe.
Billie Jean King lost early in Jacksonville, a surprise victim of Wendy Overton in the deciding point of a nine-point, sudden-death tiebreak. By the end of the week, she was back in New York City, making a public appearance where she played three-point “matches” against all comers. Anyone who aced her won a prize. Sadly, I can’t find any reports of how the public fared that day against Madame Superstar.

And you thought the tennis calendar was crowded now.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 21, 1973: One Down, Three To Go

After nearly six years of waiting, the Aussie steamroller was back in action. The once-invincible Davis Cup squad from Down Under began its 1973 campaign in Japan, a giant against a minnow for a place in the Eastern Zone final.

Australian captain Neale Fraser wasn’t yet able to call upon his full forces. Rod Laver, Ken Rosewall, and Roy Emerson had commitments elsewhere. But despite a hiccup in Hong Kong on the way to Tokyo, the Aussie side looked strong. Leading the team was 30-year-old Australian Open champ John Newcombe. Slated for second singles was 38-year-old Mal Anderson, who returned to Davis Cup play in 1972 after a 14-year absence.

Not long before, the Davis Cup trophy had a near-permanent home in Oz. Australia won the tournament on 15 of 18 tries between 1950 and 1967, replenishing its stock of stars as one after another defected to the pros. Coach Harry Hopman identified and developed talent like no one else in the world, helped by his nation’s passion for tennis and a federation that prized the Davis Cup above all else. Anderson had played for the Cup-winning side in 1957, Fraser had contributed to titles from 1958 to 1962, and Newcombe had donned the colors from 1963 to 1967.

But when tennis went “Open” in 1968, the Davis Cup didn’t quite follow suit. Professionals were allowed, but not “contract” professionals–the men signed to deals with the likes of the National Tennis League and World Championship Tennis. That included all of the best Australian players: Laver, Rosewall, Newk, Emerson, and more. The second-string Aussies couldn’t compete with the teams from the United States and Romania that dominated the Cup in the first years of the Open era.

Then, in 1973, contract pros were allowed back in. The U.S. was the defending champion, but in a fully open Davis Cup, there could be only one favorite.

In a tie that began on April 21st, Japan became the Aussies’ first victim. Armed with little other than home-court advantage, Jun Kamiwazumi and Toshiro Sakai took on Newcombe and Anderson, respectively. Both played better than expected; neither managed an upset. Kamiwazumi, the Japanese number one, was a particular surprise. He snatched the second set before Newk streaked back, taking 20 of 24 points to secure the third.

The next day, the Japanese doubles pairing of Kamiwazumi and Sakai targeted Geoff Masters, the Australian they considered to be the team’s weakest link. But there weren’t really any weak Aussies on the doubles court. Masters certainly belonged there, leading Newk to a straight-set victory, clinching the tie.

Reclaiming the Davis Cup would require victories in four rounds: The opening tie in Tokyo, the zonal final, an inter-zone semi-final against a European champion, and the final in December. While the Aussies took care of Japan, Vijay Amritraj and his Indian team swept past Pakistan, setting up an India-Australia clash for early May.

Newcombe looked ahead from the moment he stepped off the doubles court. The first words out of his mouth: “One down–three to go.”

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 17, 1973: Upsets Abound in Johannesburg

Tennis had a fraught relationship with apartheid-era South Africa, but it didn’t have much of a problem with South African money. At precisely the same time that South Africa made a controversial appearance in Davis Cup play in Montevideo, half of the top stars in the men’s game hopped on airplanes to take them from Brussels to Johannesburg. Just two weeks after their arrival in Europe, the men of World Championship Tennis’s Group A were swapping continents again.

Lamar Hunt’s WCT circuit was on the hook for six-figure prize money guarantees for many of its big-name players. The South African metropolis offered a $50,000 pot at the Clows Classic. No matter that the traditional tour stop in Monte Carlo took place at the same time and would have made for a much more sensible journey from Belgium. That event was outside of Hunt’s orbit, so the gang crossed the equator instead.

There was little, if any, concern about what the trip represented. Arthur Ashe was the only Black player of note in men’s tennis. He was–conveniently enough–part of the other half of the WCT troupe, which spent the week in Charlotte, North Carolina. He didn’t have to worry about South Africa’s racist immigration policy or, if they let him in, grapple with whether he should go. Rod Laver didn’t play, but he was clearly struggling with a back injury. Protesters around the world were outraged when South African teams arrived in their countries for a visit, but there was much less argument when American and European stars made a quick jaunt to Jo’burg for a paycheck.

That didn’t mean the 5,500-mile detour was easy. Immediately upon arrival, the seeds began to fall. Stan Smith, riding a 20-match win streak, went on court 18 hours after his plane touched down. 19 hours after arrival, he was out of the tournament, a 6-2, 6-2 victim of Puerto Rican veteran Charlie Pasarell.

Pasarell was more famous for his marathons. In 1968 at the US National Indoors, he and Ron Holmberg lost a six-and-a-half-hour doubles match. A year later, he nearly upset Richard González in the Wimbledon first round, falling in a five-hour duel of big servers, 22–24, 1–6, 16–14, 6–3, 11–9. He was named the top-ranked American in 1967, but by 1973, he was essentially a journeyman, more likely to last to the weekend in doubles than in singles.

On the first day of play in Johannesburg, he served as well as ever. Smith was “tired and listless,” double-faulting away the final point of the match.

Fatigue got to some other stars, too. Fourth seed Roy Emerson and fifth seed Dick Stockton also lost on opening day. Cliff Drysdale, the top-ranked South African, managed just five games against Rhodesian Andrew Pattison. None of the top ten seeds would even reach the semi-finals. Even Pasarell didn’t last another round.

The lackluster play probably wasn’t any kind of protest against apartheid, but it was still a kind of statement. After the Johannesburg event was over, the troupe would make a U-turn, playing the following week in Gothenburg, Sweden. And the tournament that the top men really cared about–the WCT Finals in Dallas–was only a few weeks away. Contractual obligations prevented men like Smith, Laver, and Emerson from taking a break. The only way to get a breather was to lose early.

It was a long season. No one would scoff at the $10,000 winner’s check, but compared to the laurels available over the next few months, the prestige of a title at the Clows Classic was a sacrifice worth making.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 15, 1973: A Wake-Up Call From India

Australia did not take the 1973 Davis Cup campaign lightly. The lads from Down Under had watched the trophy go to the United States for five years running, the longest Australian drought since the 1930s.

1973 promised to be different. While tennis went Open in 1968, the Davis Cup did not. The International Lawn Tennis Federation (ILTF) banned contract professionals from the competition, leaving a Murderer’s Row of Australians–Rod Laver, Ken Rosewall, John Newcombe, and more–on the sidelines. The ILTF finally came to its senses and dropped the exclusion in 1973. The Aussie stars were getting old, and they weren’t about to let this first opportunity slip by.

Captain Neale Fraser got his squad together well in advance of their opening Eastern Zone tie, a tilt hosted by Japan starting on April 20th. En route, the Australian stopped in Hong Kong for the National Hardcourt Championships. Laver and Rosewall were committed to pro events elsewhere, but Fraser’s group was still the class of the Hong Kong event. Newcombe was there, joined by veteran Mal Anderson, former Wimbledon quarter-finalist John Cooper, and doubles stalwart Geoff Masters.

Hong Kong was supposed to be a warmup–both a confidence-builder and an opportunity for Fraser to get a final look at his charges.

Instead, it turned into the Vijay Amritraj show. The 19-year-old Indian had Davis Cup aspirations of his own, and he was rapidly developing into his country’s best player. The year before, he had spent two weeks in Las Vegas working on his serve with none other than his idol, Richard González.

In the quarter-finals, Amritraj upset Anderson, the 1957 US National champion and a likely singles player for Fraser’s side. In the semis, as Cooper knocked out Newcombe in a five-setter, Amritraj beat Masters in a marathon of his own. Finally, on April 15th, Vijay went another five sets, taking advantage of eight net-cord winners to beat Cooper and complete his set of Australian Davis Cup scalps.

Amritraj’s title was worth $3,000, just short of his entire 1972 haul of $3,500.

The Aussies had reason to worry: Assuming they beat Japan, they would likely face Vijay and company in the Eastern Zone final. The tie would be hosted by India, in Amritraj’s hometown of Madras.

Fraser managed to put a positive spin on the Australian oh-fer. “I am not really upset by their losses,” he told The Age. “It’s probably a blessing in disguise. Firstly the boys may have tended to take the Indians too lightly, but now Mal has been beaten by Vijay, they realize it won’t be easy in India if we beat Japan.”

Then he called ahead to Tokyo. His boys were arriving soon, and he needed to make sure that practice courts were booked and ready.

* * *

Elsewhere this week:

Billie Jean King quickly recovered her form after a one-month layoff, but not enough to beat Margaret Court. In Quincy, Court added yet another title to her 1973 haul with a 6-2, 6-4, 59-minute victory over Billie Jean.
On the rival USLTA circuit, Evonne Goolagong played some of the best tennis of her season, reaching the final in Miami Beach. She lost only five games in four matches. But it still wasn’t enough to topple Chris Evert, who beat Evonne for the fourth time in a row in the final.
Ken Rosewall, the “old man” of the circuit, picked up his second title in a row with a straight-set win over Roger Taylor in Cleveland. His backhand passing shots, always his bread and butter, were in top form.
Stan Smith continued to roll, winning in Brussels for his fourth consecutive title. Even sweeter, it was his third straight victory against Rod Laver. Laver was slowed by a back injury, and the American reeled off three sets in just 80 minutes.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 13, 1973: Vilas Stops South Africa

South Africa was a problem. Many world leaders were quick to condemn the racist policies of the apartheid government. Less clear was what exactly to do about it. As always, international sporting events fell in the crosshairs.

Eastern Bloc nations were willing to sacrifice the most. In 1968 Davis Cup play, South Africa advanced to the final of the European Zone when Romania gave them a walkover. (There was no separate Africa zone, and “zoneless” nations were free to choose another region in which to compete.) In 1969, both Poland and Czechoslovakia refused to play them. In 1970, South Africa was banned from the competition altogether.

There was never a consensus to exclude the country, and South Africa returned to competition in 1973. It chose to enter the South American zone, where the political ramifications were likely to be the least. Conveniently enough, the competition wasn’t particularly strong, either. In March, South Africa brushed aside Uruguay while Argentina defeated Brazil, setting up a zonal semi-final between the two, set to be hosted in Argentina.

The Argentines found themselves in a sticky situation. The federation had anticipated no problems; golf and rugby teams from South Africa had visited in the previous two years. But Davis Cup was one of the biggest events on the global sporting calendar, and the public outcry couldn’t be ignored. If the tie were played in Argentina, there would be protests, possibly substantial ones. On the other hand, it was unthinkable to forfeit the round, as the Eastern Europeans had done. Thanks in large part to charismatic 20-year-old star Guillermo Vilas, the tennis boom had reached Argentina. If they could get past the South Africans, Argentina would face regional rival Chile in the zonal final and push the sport’s popularity to even higher peaks.

It’s difficult to overstate just how much the South African issue roiled international sports. Arguably, it was an even more prominent, divisive issue than the fate of Russian and Belarussian athletes in 2023. The same week that Argentina’s tennis federation made its final preparations, New Zealand Prime Minister Norman Kirk settled a long-standing dispute by barring a visit from the South African rugby team. “Arguments over the tour,” wrote the New York Times, “have continued more than two years, spilling over party and racial boundaries and far eclipsing such international issues as the Vietnam War.”

Back in Argentina, the federation, pressured by the country’s Foreign Ministry, settled on a compromise. The tie would be held in Montevideo, just across the border in Uruguay. And to keep publicity down even further, the dates would be moved up by a month, from mid-May to mid-April. Once again, politics served as a cover for a bit of gamesmanship. Fiddling with the dates would keep South African standouts Cliff Drysdale, Bob Hewitt, and Frew McMillan on the sidelines. All three were committed to the World Championship Tennis circuit and couldn’t accommodate the revised schedule.

*The 1972 Davis Cup draw, with South Africa nowhere to be seen*

On April 13th, at the Carrasco Lawn Tennis Club, the sides could finally get down to business. With the WCT stars out of commission, the inexperienced Argentinian squad faced an even greener South African squad. In the first rubber, Argentina’s Julián Ganzábal held off doubles specialist Pat Cramer 6-2, 6-0, 3-6, 6-0. In the second, Vilas shut down 18-year-old Bernard Mitton in straight sets.

Vilas was far from the superstar he would later become, but the left-hander’s potential was becoming clear. He had reached finals in Cincinnati and Buenos Aires the previous year, and the Mitton match was his fifth straight victory of Argentina’s 1973 Davis Cup campaign. On the slow clay of the Carrasco Club, he may well have beaten Drysdale or McMillan, too.

But he didn’t have to. After the South Africans won the doubles on day two–the country was second only to Australia in its ability to churn out top-tier doubles players–Vilas made quick work of another teenager, Deon Joubert. Argentina’s top player lost just five games in three sets.

The international tennis community breathed a collective sigh of relief. Fractures were everywhere: The same day that the South Africans were eliminated, a spokesman for the International Lawn Tennis Federation threatened to suspend the women of the Virginia Slims tour if they continued to defy their national federations. Had Argentina lost, the Marxist government in Chile may well have forced its side to forfeit the zonal final. South Africa would have advanced to a bigger stage and the controversy would have multiplied.

Vilas hardly solved the South Africa problem, but he did punt it one year down the road. In the political and bureaucratic mess that was tennis in 1973, that counted as a major victory.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 12, 1973: Riggs Loses to an Old Man

*Ilie Năstase* *at the Palm Beach Masters doubles tournament*

In April 1973, Bobby Riggs was 55 years old. That put him in just the right demographic to enter the Palm Beach Masters. The $25,000 event was billed as the richest doubles tournament ever. It featured a mix of past and present greats, including Ilie Năstase, Jimmy Connors, and several of Riggs’s contemporaries: Don Budge, Richard González, and Pancho Segura.

The talk of the tournament, of course, was Bobby’s upcoming match with Margaret Court, barely a month away. Most of the men playing in Palm Beach were ready to bet on Riggs. The 55-year-old hustler told anyone who would listen that he was in impeccable shape, practicing every day, jogging, and watching his diet.

The tournament kicked off on April 12th. Budge complained that the organizers didn’t pair up players fairly. Riggs–probably the fittest of the older men–was teamed with 27-year-old Australian Tony Roche, who already had ten doubles majors to his name. Their first-round opponents were Sidney Wood and Hugh Curry: a limping 61-year-old businessman and a local club pro, respectively.

What should have been a rout turned into a farce. Wood, who won the 1931 Wimbledon title on a walkover, always seemed to be in the right place. The grandfather of three volleyed brilliantly and fought through leg cramps that slowed him down for much of the match. He hadn’t played a set in eight months, but on the fifth match point, he and Curry beat Riggs and Roche, 1-6, 6-3, 6-4.

“I’m just glad the sun started to go down,” said Wood, “or I wouldn’t have made it.”

On national television a few days later, Năstase and Vic Seixas beat González and Clark Graebner for the title. It clearly wasn’t how the tournament was supposed to end. Organizers scrambled to put Riggs on the final-day schedule. Bobby was to team with Frank Parker in a “Century Championship” between doubles teams with a combined age of at least 100 years, and he would play singles against Curry in a so-called “Bobby Riggs Hustle Match.”

Riggs’s fame, not to mention his reputation, preceded the Battle of the Sexes.

As for Sidney Wood, his stay in Palm Beach was a short one. He lost in the second round and went back to New York City, where he ran a business that built tennis courts. The 1970s tennis boom treated him well: His firm installed 500 new courts in 1973 alone. Wood also invented the synthetic Supreme Court surface, which the World Championship Tennis circuit used for indoor events that year.

Despite the upset in Florida, Wood continued to back his fellow veteran. “Riggs has been losing to a lot of fellows lately, which surprises me,” he told a reporter in the run-up to the Court match. “I don’t know how his legs are, but if he’s fit, I favor him.”

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 11, 1973: Return of the King

No one could begrudge Billie Jean King a rest. She played 127 matches in 1971 and 103 more in 1972, winning 27 singles titles in that two-year span. She entered the doubles every week, and she was the face of the budding Virginia Slims tour, besides.

King wasn’t the sort to take a personal day, or even sit out an event on a doctor’s recommendation. But in March 1973, after a three-set final against Margaret Court in Chicago, a stomach injury knocked her out of competition. She could barely serve for a month and the Slims circuit was forced to proceed without her. Court was both beneficiary and victim. The Australian continued to dominate in Billie Jean’s absence. But as the biggest star in the draw, she was also called upon to take over King’s media duties, a full-time job for a lesser woman.

Tournament promoters coast to coast breathed a sigh of relief on April 11th, when Billie Jean returned to action at the Boston Marina Harbor, brushing aside American veteran Farel Footman. King felt like she was “starting on the circuit all over again,” but after dropping the first two games to Footman, she lost only two more for a 6-3, 6-1 victory. Her serve was surprisingly steady for a stroke she had resumed practicing only a few days earlier.

For the famously energetic serve-and-volleyer, one month on the sidelines was enough. “The first week, while difficult to coordinate,” she told Boston Globe columnist Peter Gammons, “is also easier because one is so enthusiastic.” (Gammons is better known as a baseball writer. True to form, he made sure to ask Billie Jean about her younger brother, San Francisco Giants pitcher Randy Moffitt.)

Still, the 29-year-old King recognized that another 100-match season could do more harm than good. “In a way, being off the tour for awhile may have been beneficial,” she said after her first-round victory. “I’m usually pooped by October, and the rest could help.”

Billie Jean would struggle to stay healthy throughout the season, playing barely 70 singles matches. But when she was able to take the court, she remained one of the most fearsome women on the circuit. And when the world tuned in to watch her in late September, she would prove to have plenty left in the tank.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 8, 1973: 78-2

*Margaret Court (right), with Max-Pax Coffee Classic runner-up Kerry Harris*

The Philadelphia Daily News called Margaret Court “the siege-gun of women’s tennis.” It was a useful way to visualize the the Australian’s attack, but most siege victims lasted far longer than Court’s opponents ever did.

On April 8, 1973, Court secured the title at Philadelphia’s Max-Pax Coffee Tennis Classic, the first professional women’s tennis tournament ever held in Philly. The feel-good story of the week was Kerry Harris, a 23-year-old Aussie who came through qualifying to reach the final. No woman had ever done that on the Virginia Slims tour, and Margaret ensured that she went no further.

The final lasted all of 38 minutes. Harris won the fourth game, and that was it. The tournament experimented with no-ad scoring, which might have shaved a couple of minutes off of the championship match, but let’s be honest: Kerry didn’t make it to deuce very often.

Yes, it was brutal. “At your average execution,” wrote Tom Cushman of the Daily News, “they at least blindfold the victim.” At the same time, it was typical. Court won her first-round match in 41 minutes; her second-rounder against Val Ziegenfuss took just 32. After that match, Ziegenfuss spotted Margaret’s husband Barry and teased that he wasn’t doing his job. Court had too much energy.

The Philly champ was unusual in that her family traveled with her; even more so that the entourage included her infant son, Danny. She had stepped away from the tour after discovering she was pregnant in the summer of 1971. She returned a year later and won a title as a mother on her first try, beating Evonne Goolagong in Cincinnati. She finished 1972 with an Australian Open crown and a 29-match winning streak.

Embed from Getty Images

The Court family in March 1973

The rest of the 1973 Virginia Slims circuit didn’t stand a chance. The Max-Pax was Margaret’s tenth event on the tour. She won eight of them. The dismantling of Harris was her 78th victory in 80 matches. She was as strong as ever–Rosie Casals dubbed her “The Arm,” for the oversized limb that did so much damage–and she somehow came back from childbirth lighter and faster than before. Out of ideas, her opponents were reduced to joking about kidnapping Danny to distract her.

The danger of Court’s dominance was that it could verge on the boring. Billie Jean King was injured, so Margaret had little competition among the Slims group. Women pros were split into two factions; Goolagong and Chris Evert headlined the rival USLTA circuit, and functionaries threatened to keep the “semi-outlaw” Slims players out of the grand slams, too. Political maneuvering made for better stories than Margaret’s perfunctory victories.

Another subplot loomed over the Australian’s season, too. She had accepted a challenge from Bobby Riggs to play an exhibition match in Ramona, California, on Mother’s Day, now barely a month away. Neil Amdur of the New York Times reminded his readers of that date on the Philadelphia champ’s calendar. Court was more than just a slugger, Amdur wrote. She “also is a thinker, which some people seem to be forgetting as they forecast doom for her in the much-publicized May 13 match.”

Margaret’s mental strength has always been a subject of debate, and many contemporary pundits were not as kind as Amdur. Would Riggs, the puff-balling veteran, expose her tendency to choke? At the very least, the Mother’s Day clash promised something that the Slims tournaments rarely delivered: a Court match without the certainty of a lopsided victory.

* * *

Elsewhere this week:

Stan Smith won his third consecutive tournament as his half of the World Championship Tennis troupe moved to Europe. In Munich, he straight-setted Cliff Richey in the final. The victory moved him ahead of Rod Laver in the WCT point standings.
The other WCT event of the week, in Houston, gave 38-year-old Ken Rosewall his first title of the year. He avenged his Vancouver loss to Jan Kodeš in the semi-finals, then defeated Fred Stolle for the championship.
The European clay circuit also got underway in Barcelona. Ilie Năstase collected the trophy with a final-round win over Adriano Panatta, who knocked out 16-year-old Björn Borg in the third round.
Chris Evert cruised to another title on the USLTA circuit, picking up a $5,000 check in Sarasota by brushing aside Evonne Goolagong. She lost just five games. Martina Navratilova made her first appearance in a stateside title match, partnering countrywoman Marie Neumannová to a runner-up finish in the doubles.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email:

April 6, 1973: The Designated Hitter

Many major sports have no compunctions about changing the rules on a nearly constant basis. Too much scoring? Give the defense more freedom. Too little scoring? Unleash the offense. Games too long, or too boring? Stick a clock on the court and force teams to maintain a quicker pace of play.

The two exceptions are baseball and tennis. Both games have been notoriously, persistently reluctant to change in their 150-or-so years as spectator sports. Occasionally, though, circumstances converge to make change possible.

In the early 1970s, a lot of circumstances converged. New leagues sprouted, competition flourished like never before, and–most of all–television forced each sport’s leadership to consider exactly what its product was, and what it should look like.

Baseball’s American League responded to a spate of low scoring seasons and weak attendance by introducing the designated hitter rule. The National League had more history and more stars, but beginning in 1973, the American League–thanks to its willingness to experiment–added more offense. By the end of the decade, it had closed much of the attendance gap.

New York Yankee Ron Blomberg became baseball’s first designated hitter on April 6, 1973. The bat he used for his first time at the plate was sent to the Hall of Fame, even though it barely left his shoulder. In that first appearance of a designated hitter, Blomberg came up with the bases loaded and walked.

Matty Alou, the Yankees veteran who scored on the play, cracked: “See, it’s added offense to the game already.”

* * *

What strikes me about the designated hitter rule is how closely it parallels the adoption of the tiebreak. I’ve already written a few times about the tiebreak in this series about 1973. The now-familiar method of ending sets was still new, and it was still weird.

“Those tie-breakers are such bullshit,” said Raymond Moore after a win in Vancouver in March. “None of the players know how to play them yet.”

Embed from Getty Images

John Newcombe (left) and Stan Smith were considered in 1973 to be among the best tiebreak players in the game. The secret, clearly, was in the mustache.

Some players didn’t like it, but the sport needed to evolve. Jimmy Van Alen had pushed for tie-breaks as part of his “Simplified Scoring System” since the 1950s. We tend to think of long sets as epic, memorable moments. Not so in those days: The typical 12-10 set consisted of two guys who couldn’t return serve for 75 minutes. It wasn’t much fun to watch, and it would never fit into a two-hour slot on network television.

So, nearly a century after competitive tennis began, the sport finally embraced a new idea. The US Open adopted Van Alen’s nine-point “sudden death” tiebreak in 1970, and Wimbledon began playing breakers at 8-all in 1971. World Team Tennis would experiment even further beginning in 1974. While tennis–like designated-hitter baseball–remained easily recognizable, the new rule was a belated acknowledgement that even the most hidebound sports need to change with the times.

For nearly a half-century, purists in both baseball and tennis were left with something to cling to. Pitchers batted for themselves in National League games until 2021, and a first-round match at that year’s French Open ran to 10-8 in the fifth. But the traditionalists could hold out no longer. The designated hitter is now universal in American baseball. Both the grand slams and the Davis Cup have adopted rules to decide every deadlocked set with a tiebreak. The rule changes that represented such a shift 50 years ago finally won the day.

* * *

You can also subscribe to the blog to receive each new post by email: